data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6e8d/f6e8d7ed98706738a9e47f2909e0afd168963f38" alt=""
let me concur with Rue Hazard's call for more oafishness--
"And breezing that against so many poesies pures, in the issue of "No" at hand, frankly, what I long for (in the "scene" generally) is more oafishness. Not the recombinant superior gleaming machine-oafishness of flarf-generators, but the droopy drawers, stumbled-down, anything goes inheritors of the Biotherm-esque O'Hara, Berryman's big mess, and Ammons's barrages of garbage. Or Bernadette Mayer's dishevel'd junkyard dog opus, or Alice Notley's sass in the filigree. Ain't there a chill despotic cleanliness, a shard-preciosity, all around now? More splendid piss-burn and rags and jags! More guffaw and betises! More spilt Willies!"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1fe33/1fe33361ad4b66e8bbd7abc58087fd7687459724" alt="Posted by Picasa"